Four months ago I predicted that I may be able to normalize my posting schedule. Apparently my skills as a forecaster are dubious at best. More pressing matters have consumed my attention; furthermore, the "MBA advice" aim of this blog has run its course. Everything I posted earlier on this blog contains the most pertinent material for those who are considering getting their MBA by traditional means. Therefore, my subsequent posts will focus more on just relating the balancing act that takes place during the closing months of the program.
That act includes my post-MBA career efforts and research, - in an economy as dubious as my commitment to this blog - my interest in the presidential race, my firstborn starting school, my current job, my class schedule, my self-directed education efforts and my brother's summer wedding. The takeaway is that the end is getting more difficult and compressed, not easier. Albeit, the classes I'm taking are much more attuned to my interests, so I am more eager to do the necessary work; however, that just adds more time spent for school.
I'm also finding my interest diverging and competition for my attention is increasing. This race is of particular interest to me and I find myself reading accounts on it instead of my bedside textbooks. Paired with the challenge of exploring new career opportunities in this suspect economy and my time is well allotted.
At the bottom of the list is this blog and the aforementioned reason in particular: this blog has served its purpose. There is no further reason for me to continue adding comments that add no relevant value to the reader or myself. If you stumble across this blog, I encourage you go back to the first handful of posts and glean the material there. The later posts are the Long Tail of this blog and only applicable to a small niche of readers.
With that, I promise to make one more post to this blog and will do so at the conclusion of my MBA program at SMU. I will wait a couple weeks, maybe a month after graduation, to make the post so I can internalize the whole episode; and the post will be geared at passing judgment on m experience through a traditional part-time MBA program, specifically at SMU.
So, until then.
Friday, May 16, 2008
Friday, January 11, 2008
The Countdown Continued
(Continued from previous post)
In summary, I still see the value of the traditional MBA for myself and for a significant portion of other MBA candidates and holders. The network I am building, the forced effort I am exerting to study, test and develop skills, and the salary bump all make the value of my MBA have a high NPV.
The Horizon Value
The next eleven months spell the culmination of my graduate work. I will be working on my concentration coursework in Finance and Strategy, evaluating my career path, talking with industry leaders in target employment sectors and balancing work and family time. Additionally, I've bought a number of supplementary reading materials to augment my studies at school. All of this is geared toward maximizing my growth potential in the outer years, as I get farther away from my degree award date.
I expect a large bump to come once I switch positions with my current company or transition to a new employer and industry. The large bump will take care of the my MBA investment, but the sustainable returns will be based on growing my compensation five, 10 and 20 years from now. I will have the benefit of coming out of the program as an experienced professional since I've been working full-time as well. The best indicator for future career growth is a history of increasing responsibility and challenge. The same litmus test can be applied to MBA programs.
A number of MBA candidates struggle through their core requirement classes, which constitutes 50% of the program, with a singular focus: "I can't wait to get to my concentration work, because then it all becomes much easier." This is disconcerting. This degrades the value of the MBA. This shortchanges candidates on their growth potential in the outer years.
While it does take some time for most candidates to readjust to the challenge of the classroom setting and time management, coursework needs to be increasing in difficulty, challenge and content. To choose otherwise does not maximize the value of the investment. Our goal as MBA students is to develop the tools that accelerate and sustain growth: that only occurs when chosen courses are increasingly more challenging and dense.
This is what separates the Movers and Shakers from the Riders. When I sit down to interview candidates, I am interested in someone that has routinely demonstrated the ability to set higher standards for herself. I expect nothing less of myself. I'm excited for the challenges this year's coursework will bring.
In summary, I still see the value of the traditional MBA for myself and for a significant portion of other MBA candidates and holders. The network I am building, the forced effort I am exerting to study, test and develop skills, and the salary bump all make the value of my MBA have a high NPV.
The Horizon Value
The next eleven months spell the culmination of my graduate work. I will be working on my concentration coursework in Finance and Strategy, evaluating my career path, talking with industry leaders in target employment sectors and balancing work and family time. Additionally, I've bought a number of supplementary reading materials to augment my studies at school. All of this is geared toward maximizing my growth potential in the outer years, as I get farther away from my degree award date.
I expect a large bump to come once I switch positions with my current company or transition to a new employer and industry. The large bump will take care of the my MBA investment, but the sustainable returns will be based on growing my compensation five, 10 and 20 years from now. I will have the benefit of coming out of the program as an experienced professional since I've been working full-time as well. The best indicator for future career growth is a history of increasing responsibility and challenge. The same litmus test can be applied to MBA programs.
A number of MBA candidates struggle through their core requirement classes, which constitutes 50% of the program, with a singular focus: "I can't wait to get to my concentration work, because then it all becomes much easier." This is disconcerting. This degrades the value of the MBA. This shortchanges candidates on their growth potential in the outer years.
While it does take some time for most candidates to readjust to the challenge of the classroom setting and time management, coursework needs to be increasing in difficulty, challenge and content. To choose otherwise does not maximize the value of the investment. Our goal as MBA students is to develop the tools that accelerate and sustain growth: that only occurs when chosen courses are increasingly more challenging and dense.
This is what separates the Movers and Shakers from the Riders. When I sit down to interview candidates, I am interested in someone that has routinely demonstrated the ability to set higher standards for herself. I expect nothing less of myself. I'm excited for the challenges this year's coursework will bring.
Monday, January 7, 2008
The Countdown Begins: Eleven Months
Using the posting frequency of late, that means I've only got five more posts left before the end of school. That's with a simple average. If I degrade my posting frequency at the same rate that has taken place over the last six months, it's more likely I'll post only three more times. I'll make that my goal. Under promise, over deliver.
Since the last post I have completed another two classes and gone through the final significant break before the mad dash to the finish. I resume coursework tomorrow.
A summary is in order, and in the spirit of the new year, I'll look back and provide a glimpse of the future.
The Past Year
The Value of the MBA, Revisited
The score was about six to four in my favor: 66.6% of the classes were well worth the funds, time and energy while 33.3% could not fill a 50-page "how-to" tome. I have reasonable expectations that this average will improve over the next 12 courses because I am in charge of the classes and professors with which I complete my degree. I'd lay odds that the ending tally with be at least a 75-25 split.
The question then becomes "Is it worth it?" This is a question that is explored ad nauseum - see my friend Josh Kaufman's website the Personal MBA for additional information - and it is popular to disparage the MBA's value. When you consider that a Harvard MBA will run about $75,000 for tuition, books and fees (excluding opportunity costs, room & board, etc.), the MBA student declares that she is okay with the $18,750 going toward the sup-par 25%. Most opponents of the MBA argue that the last sentence is beside the point: instead, why pay $75,000 in the first place for a degree that has dubious results?
Now keep in mind that I have the confirmation bias present because I am personally invested in the success of the MBA; however, I'm going to attempt to present a cogent argument in support of the MBA with the qualification that my argument only supports 20% of the current MBA candidate and graduate population. MBA dilution has occurred due to the presence of the other 80%.
I'm going to divide the percentiles above into two groups: The 20-percenters I will call "Movers and Shakers" and the 80-percenters will be called "Riders." Rather than focus specifically on the Movers and Shakers group in the context of the MBA realm alone, let's expand this group to be 20% of industry professionals and leaders. The remaining 80% finds itself standing on the shoulders of the Movers and Shakers.
The strata within the Movers and Shakers is diverse. Some individuals have doctorates while others are college or, even worse, high school drop outs. There are visionaries, managers, creatives, quants and all types represented. Different learning styles are represented and different foibles play vice to members. At the end of the day, a single template does not apply to the entire group.
Riders on the other hand, capitalize on the Movers and Shakers work. Schools of thought are dispersed by Riders once introduced by Movers and Shakers. It's the symbiotic relationship of the alpha and beta group dynamic: alpha members innovate while beta members propagate.
Group members choose their own path and at times they create it. And once a path is forged there will be followers. The path that enabled one person to be successful with enable others. As more and more people tread the path, its value will decrease, scarcity being what it is.
I need to summarize before this metaphor gets out of hand. For the longest time, getting a high school diploma was a mark of success. Then government mandated education came along through the 12th grade and scarcity shifted to the undergraduate degree in higher education. Undergraduate work is still a market indicator for employment but not as scarce. Less than 20% of the working population has a graduate degree and it is the scarcer for resource. It is the stronger market indicator. And people naturally see it as more valuable.
The graduate degree is not nearly as valuable as it once was, but it is valuable nonetheless. But it is not valuable to everyone. In the same way that it made more sense for Mr. Gates to drop out of Harvard because the opportunity costs were too high to stay in school, the opportunity costs with the MBA are too great for a certain strata of Movers and Shakers. But that doesn't disparage the value of the MBA for the entire population. For some people, the MBA makes absolute sense because of yields on a scale that are negligible to others.
And I absolutely agree that the value of the MBA will continue to decrease as long as supply continues to come on the market. That is beside the point. The MBA still holds value today. The time value of money may indicate that it is the optimum choice.
Take Student A who saddles the fence between being a Mover and Shaker and being a Rider. This person is content to settle somewhere in middle management. They are currently making a respectable salary and they know that they will eventually get to a higher salary. If they can append the salary to a sooner date, however, they stand the chance of a better life earlier.
Student A is going to work part-time and thinks that she can accelerate her career five years. Her initial investment will be a lump sum of $75,000. At graduation she will jump her salary $25,000. We'll assume a discount rate of 10% on the money she could have invested. So here is the breakdown:
Lump Sum: $-75,000
Discount Rate: 10%
Payment Periods: 7 (2 years in school)
FCF, Years 3-7: $25,000
The Net Present Value of this decision comes out to +$3,020.
Pursuing her MBA makes sense for Student A, UNLESS she can increase her opportunity cost of capital, or find a project that yields a higher net present value. But for a large proportion of the population, they can't. A select few can. Many just aren't in a position to do so because they either don't know how, have other personal circumstances, can't commit unless their money is on the line or a myriad of other reasons. The MBA is a viable vehicle and it works and makes sense for them.
I have my reasons for why I started my program. Thus far they have panned out. When I have the benefit to employ some hindsight bias, I may question whether the MBA really bumped my career/salary as much as I hoped it would. For a segment of people, it will bump their salary and they will have a positive NPV. I hope to be one of those.
(Reflection continued in next post)
Since the last post I have completed another two classes and gone through the final significant break before the mad dash to the finish. I resume coursework tomorrow.
A summary is in order, and in the spirit of the new year, I'll look back and provide a glimpse of the future.
The Past Year
The Value of the MBA, Revisited
The score was about six to four in my favor: 66.6% of the classes were well worth the funds, time and energy while 33.3% could not fill a 50-page "how-to" tome. I have reasonable expectations that this average will improve over the next 12 courses because I am in charge of the classes and professors with which I complete my degree. I'd lay odds that the ending tally with be at least a 75-25 split.
The question then becomes "Is it worth it?" This is a question that is explored ad nauseum - see my friend Josh Kaufman's website the Personal MBA for additional information - and it is popular to disparage the MBA's value. When you consider that a Harvard MBA will run about $75,000 for tuition, books and fees (excluding opportunity costs, room & board, etc.), the MBA student declares that she is okay with the $18,750 going toward the sup-par 25%. Most opponents of the MBA argue that the last sentence is beside the point: instead, why pay $75,000 in the first place for a degree that has dubious results?
Now keep in mind that I have the confirmation bias present because I am personally invested in the success of the MBA; however, I'm going to attempt to present a cogent argument in support of the MBA with the qualification that my argument only supports 20% of the current MBA candidate and graduate population. MBA dilution has occurred due to the presence of the other 80%.
I'm going to divide the percentiles above into two groups: The 20-percenters I will call "Movers and Shakers" and the 80-percenters will be called "Riders." Rather than focus specifically on the Movers and Shakers group in the context of the MBA realm alone, let's expand this group to be 20% of industry professionals and leaders. The remaining 80% finds itself standing on the shoulders of the Movers and Shakers.
The strata within the Movers and Shakers is diverse. Some individuals have doctorates while others are college or, even worse, high school drop outs. There are visionaries, managers, creatives, quants and all types represented. Different learning styles are represented and different foibles play vice to members. At the end of the day, a single template does not apply to the entire group.
Riders on the other hand, capitalize on the Movers and Shakers work. Schools of thought are dispersed by Riders once introduced by Movers and Shakers. It's the symbiotic relationship of the alpha and beta group dynamic: alpha members innovate while beta members propagate.
Group members choose their own path and at times they create it. And once a path is forged there will be followers. The path that enabled one person to be successful with enable others. As more and more people tread the path, its value will decrease, scarcity being what it is.
I need to summarize before this metaphor gets out of hand. For the longest time, getting a high school diploma was a mark of success. Then government mandated education came along through the 12th grade and scarcity shifted to the undergraduate degree in higher education. Undergraduate work is still a market indicator for employment but not as scarce. Less than 20% of the working population has a graduate degree and it is the scarcer for resource. It is the stronger market indicator. And people naturally see it as more valuable.
The graduate degree is not nearly as valuable as it once was, but it is valuable nonetheless. But it is not valuable to everyone. In the same way that it made more sense for Mr. Gates to drop out of Harvard because the opportunity costs were too high to stay in school, the opportunity costs with the MBA are too great for a certain strata of Movers and Shakers. But that doesn't disparage the value of the MBA for the entire population. For some people, the MBA makes absolute sense because of yields on a scale that are negligible to others.
And I absolutely agree that the value of the MBA will continue to decrease as long as supply continues to come on the market. That is beside the point. The MBA still holds value today. The time value of money may indicate that it is the optimum choice.
Take Student A who saddles the fence between being a Mover and Shaker and being a Rider. This person is content to settle somewhere in middle management. They are currently making a respectable salary and they know that they will eventually get to a higher salary. If they can append the salary to a sooner date, however, they stand the chance of a better life earlier.
Student A is going to work part-time and thinks that she can accelerate her career five years. Her initial investment will be a lump sum of $75,000. At graduation she will jump her salary $25,000. We'll assume a discount rate of 10% on the money she could have invested. So here is the breakdown:
Lump Sum: $-75,000
Discount Rate: 10%
Payment Periods: 7 (2 years in school)
FCF, Years 3-7: $25,000
The Net Present Value of this decision comes out to +$3,020.
Pursuing her MBA makes sense for Student A, UNLESS she can increase her opportunity cost of capital, or find a project that yields a higher net present value. But for a large proportion of the population, they can't. A select few can. Many just aren't in a position to do so because they either don't know how, have other personal circumstances, can't commit unless their money is on the line or a myriad of other reasons. The MBA is a viable vehicle and it works and makes sense for them.
I have my reasons for why I started my program. Thus far they have panned out. When I have the benefit to employ some hindsight bias, I may question whether the MBA really bumped my career/salary as much as I hoped it would. For a segment of people, it will bump their salary and they will have a positive NPV. I hope to be one of those.
(Reflection continued in next post)
Friday, November 2, 2007
No Promises
Two months. That's eight Friday's of clicking the "Dismiss" button on my Outlook Alert instructing me to "Post to Blog." It's a matter of priorities and waxing philosophical about my MBA efforts has not been one of them.
I'm now half way through the program and I've started working on my concentration coursework.
Sidebar: I didn't fully explain the concentration option at SMU in previous posts. Many business schools have a set curriculum for the MBA programs they offer. SMU allows its MBA candidates to focus on the specific disciplines after completing the core coursework. The program is 48 credits in length, 20 of which are dedicated to core coursework. The remaining 28 credits can be allocated as the student deems. My concentrations are Finance (14 credits required) and Strategy (14 credits required). So every one of my remaining courses will be either Finance or Strategy.
The ability to choose concentrations is a big selling point for SMU and was key for me. My undergraduate work was in liberal arts and appealed to the more qualitative side of business. Returning to school was partially motivated by the desire to bulk up on the quantitative skills. I can focus on that at SMU.
END SIDEBAR
Within my Strategy work I'm focusing on the more quantitative courses as well, specifically in Mergers & Acquisitions, Game Theory and Private Equity & Venture Capital. My Finance concentration courses will lean toward more of the Corporate Finance and Valuation side of the discipline.
This week has been spent going over my Spring '08 courses. I am applying for a course SMU offers through the Strategy department called the Venture Capital Practicum. When evaluating programs, be sure to research the types of Practicums (self-study/portfolio experience) they offer. This type of course is the laboratory for the classroom material. In my case, I will be assigned to a VC firm and manage a proposal and recommendation from a business seeking funding. I will perform the due diligence, evaluation, etc. and do so under the tutelage of the VC firm partners. Very valuable. I hope my application is competitive enough to be chosen.
This Fall semester also marks the beginning of a program that SMU offers that is virtually exclusive to the school: the Associate Board program. The name is misleading; the program is a mentoring program where SMU assigns area business leaders -- all senior executives -- with students interested in the industry/business in which the mentor works. I received the mentor I chose and have begun the process.
During the course of the mentor/mentee relationship, I can expect to build my industry contacts by 15-20 persons, learn hard skills for the industry, focus my resume for the industry, and on and on. This program is more valuable to me than my degree when it comes to securing a position in the industry and with the company I want to work. The degree is valuable, however, my mentor will help me lay the groundwork for post-Grad employment quicker than the degree.
This is a quick summary of some of the things going on. I make no promises that I will post more frequently, but hope to do so again in a few weeks.
I'm now half way through the program and I've started working on my concentration coursework.
Sidebar: I didn't fully explain the concentration option at SMU in previous posts. Many business schools have a set curriculum for the MBA programs they offer. SMU allows its MBA candidates to focus on the specific disciplines after completing the core coursework. The program is 48 credits in length, 20 of which are dedicated to core coursework. The remaining 28 credits can be allocated as the student deems. My concentrations are Finance (14 credits required) and Strategy (14 credits required). So every one of my remaining courses will be either Finance or Strategy.
The ability to choose concentrations is a big selling point for SMU and was key for me. My undergraduate work was in liberal arts and appealed to the more qualitative side of business. Returning to school was partially motivated by the desire to bulk up on the quantitative skills. I can focus on that at SMU.
END SIDEBAR
Within my Strategy work I'm focusing on the more quantitative courses as well, specifically in Mergers & Acquisitions, Game Theory and Private Equity & Venture Capital. My Finance concentration courses will lean toward more of the Corporate Finance and Valuation side of the discipline.
This week has been spent going over my Spring '08 courses. I am applying for a course SMU offers through the Strategy department called the Venture Capital Practicum. When evaluating programs, be sure to research the types of Practicums (self-study/portfolio experience) they offer. This type of course is the laboratory for the classroom material. In my case, I will be assigned to a VC firm and manage a proposal and recommendation from a business seeking funding. I will perform the due diligence, evaluation, etc. and do so under the tutelage of the VC firm partners. Very valuable. I hope my application is competitive enough to be chosen.
This Fall semester also marks the beginning of a program that SMU offers that is virtually exclusive to the school: the Associate Board program. The name is misleading; the program is a mentoring program where SMU assigns area business leaders -- all senior executives -- with students interested in the industry/business in which the mentor works. I received the mentor I chose and have begun the process.
During the course of the mentor/mentee relationship, I can expect to build my industry contacts by 15-20 persons, learn hard skills for the industry, focus my resume for the industry, and on and on. This program is more valuable to me than my degree when it comes to securing a position in the industry and with the company I want to work. The degree is valuable, however, my mentor will help me lay the groundwork for post-Grad employment quicker than the degree.
This is a quick summary of some of the things going on. I make no promises that I will post more frequently, but hope to do so again in a few weeks.
Friday, August 31, 2007
It's Fall in Dallas. And it's 104 Degrees F.
I have a sinking feeling that the posting frequency is going to stay like this for a while. It's been three weeks since my last post and it feels much longer.
I am now through the second week of the Fall semester, Mod A (25% complete). This semester is quickly shaping up to be the most onerous thus far. Between work, school, family and referee assignments my schedule is full. At least it's the best season of the year.
* * * * *
I wrapped up the summer semester the first week in August leaving a healthy two week break before the next round of classes began. It wasn't that healthy.
These breaks can be your death knell. For many of us, after pushing for a long period without coming up for air, when the break does finally come, not only do you mentally check out, your body takes a break also. Your immune system goes AWOL. The slightest strain of anything in the air attacks you and sets you back for the entire break.
Of course, you have enough time to recover; however, this time I spent so much time physically recovering, I left no time for mental recovery. The most difficult thing after a break like this is getting motivated again. You see the same cases you have during undergraduate. You're still going over your core coursework that most likely is not all that interesting to you. And it's still nice outside. Again, for those of you who look down on the MBA, people that overcome this alone should develop at least some level of respect.
Bottom line: Avoid breaks if you can. Just suffocate yourself for two years. At least, that's what I'd prefer.
* * * * *
This semester's first module presents the final two core courses of the program; it's all electives and concentration coursework after this.
My schedule includes:
The Ops course covers the following:
The Strategy course covers the usual as well:
I am now through the second week of the Fall semester, Mod A (25% complete). This semester is quickly shaping up to be the most onerous thus far. Between work, school, family and referee assignments my schedule is full. At least it's the best season of the year.
* * * * *
I wrapped up the summer semester the first week in August leaving a healthy two week break before the next round of classes began. It wasn't that healthy.
These breaks can be your death knell. For many of us, after pushing for a long period without coming up for air, when the break does finally come, not only do you mentally check out, your body takes a break also. Your immune system goes AWOL. The slightest strain of anything in the air attacks you and sets you back for the entire break.
Of course, you have enough time to recover; however, this time I spent so much time physically recovering, I left no time for mental recovery. The most difficult thing after a break like this is getting motivated again. You see the same cases you have during undergraduate. You're still going over your core coursework that most likely is not all that interesting to you. And it's still nice outside. Again, for those of you who look down on the MBA, people that overcome this alone should develop at least some level of respect.
Bottom line: Avoid breaks if you can. Just suffocate yourself for two years. At least, that's what I'd prefer.
* * * * *
This semester's first module presents the final two core courses of the program; it's all electives and concentration coursework after this.
My schedule includes:
- Strategic Management; and
- Operations Management.
The Ops course covers the following:
- Process Analysis and Improvement
- System Design
- Project Management
- Queue Management
The Strategy course covers the usual as well:
- Industry Analysis (Porter's Five)
- Competitive Advantage
- The Value Chain
- Competitive Intelligence
Friday, August 10, 2007
Long Overdue Update
It's been nearly a month since I last posted. I will resume normal posting status in September once the Fall semester is in full swing.
A quick update about the last module in the summer semester:
I wrapped up Marketing Management and Corporate Finance this week with a take home final and an in class final, assigned respectively. This module was the most valuable series thus far in the program. The marketing course was case based and had the best mix of quantitative vs. qualitative instruction I've ever experienced.
Finance covered the core principles:
I'm still wrestling over which direction to take my strategy concentration: I can choose between Ops/Marketing Strategy or Finance Strategy. I have interest in both sides. I just don't have the time to adequately pursue each. I'd end up diluting them too much.
Maybe its time to do a decision tree for this.
A quick update about the last module in the summer semester:
I wrapped up Marketing Management and Corporate Finance this week with a take home final and an in class final, assigned respectively. This module was the most valuable series thus far in the program. The marketing course was case based and had the best mix of quantitative vs. qualitative instruction I've ever experienced.
Finance covered the core principles:
- Time Value of Money
- Net Present Value
- Capital Budgeting
- Stock Valuation
- WACC
- Etc.
I'm still wrestling over which direction to take my strategy concentration: I can choose between Ops/Marketing Strategy or Finance Strategy. I have interest in both sides. I just don't have the time to adequately pursue each. I'd end up diluting them too much.
Maybe its time to do a decision tree for this.
Monday, July 16, 2007
Personal MBA Reading List Announcement
I have posted before about the Personal MBA run by the venerable Josh Kaufman and want to make sure that readers here don't miss the opportunity to see the new reading list he's compiled.
The list hasn't been posted yet, but the announcement can be found here. Take a look at what is coming and be sure to check back regularly. I'll keep you updated here as well.
The list hasn't been posted yet, but the announcement can be found here. Take a look at what is coming and be sure to check back regularly. I'll keep you updated here as well.
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
Summer Semester, Module B Summary
I'm in the middle of my seventh and eighth program courses. Where does the time go? As a side note, those of you who are putting off joining a program because you don't have the time, reconsider. Time accelerates and compresses so much, you don't have the opportunity to consider what you've gotten yourself into. Just get started.
This module marks the first two classes that represent what I wanted to get out of this program:
A word on course methodology: When deciding which school to attend, I implore you to dig deep about teaching style. I've had two professors that claim to use the case method thus far: one thought he used the method and the other actually uses the method. Case studies are - hands down - the best way to go through B-School. I can prove this empirically - ask me for the digression. Make sure that whatever school you choose, this is the primary methodology.
I will touch on material covered in each course in future posts.
This module marks the first two classes that represent what I wanted to get out of this program:
- Marketing Management & Strategy; and
- Corporate Finance
A word on course methodology: When deciding which school to attend, I implore you to dig deep about teaching style. I've had two professors that claim to use the case method thus far: one thought he used the method and the other actually uses the method. Case studies are - hands down - the best way to go through B-School. I can prove this empirically - ask me for the digression. Make sure that whatever school you choose, this is the primary methodology.
I will touch on material covered in each course in future posts.
On Conflict Management
It's bound to happen at least once during the program. At least once. My quota was met this last week and it involved an assigned final grade.
The grade was not reflective of my work and did not account for the situation that ended up yielding four different professors for a single seven week course. My goal was to get a grade that was accurate and base it on reason and rationality; I didn't want the change because I was a squeaky wheel.
So here is what I learned based on the solid tactics I employed and the mistakes made:
The result was I got what I needed.
The grade was not reflective of my work and did not account for the situation that ended up yielding four different professors for a single seven week course. My goal was to get a grade that was accurate and base it on reason and rationality; I didn't want the change because I was a squeaky wheel.
So here is what I learned based on the solid tactics I employed and the mistakes made:
- Keep it professional: Before each correspondence with a faculty member or administration office, I committed to an hour long break after learning something new that got my blood levels up. I forced myself to write down all the arguments I was thinking and distill them to the pertinent and reasonable base. The result was that I was thanked and complimented by more than one person for taking the professional approach to the situation.
- Follow the chain of command: I made an early mistake here. I took issue with how my exam was graded and rather than speak first with the grading professor, I went to the chair of the department. The student body was instructed to do this, but that is no defense for myself: I should have been aware of how this would make the grading professor feel and respond. He didn't appreciate it. If you have an issue, take it to the professor first and follow the chain of command only as necessary.
- Pick your battles: I had an issue. I was not happy with my grade. I was not happy with how the overall situation was handled. I was not happy with the department's initial response. On and on it goes. My biggest pitfall came at not deciding which point to get across. It all came down to the grade change. I needed it to move up. My dissatisfaction with everything else became moot. And I brought some of it into the discussion which was ill advised. When a conflict is coming, you need to decide your endgame. If you want the other party to do something you need to identify the points of contention immediately and only the relevant issues. Don't fall into the trap of pointing out all the faults with the situation. It won't help and only makes the other party defensive.
- Honestly appraise the good things: This can sound like flattery; however, sincere appraisals of a professor's good performance can go a long way. If you've listened to the other person's complaints, you can reinforce or reaffirm them with honest feedback that convinces them that you both want the same thing: you want to maintain an amicable relationship.
The result was I got what I needed.
Thursday, June 21, 2007
An MBA's Satisfaction
I had an intense feeling of satisfaction yesterday. It had nothing to do with the fact that the day marked the end of the worst course thus far. It had nothing to with the fact that I am no longer required to take any accounting courses. I out thought Excel. Nothing more.
If you're considering starting your MBA you need to be aware of one critical aspect of your education: you're going to learn a lot about Excel and you're going to pay a lot to learn it. Solver. Sumproduct. Reference cells. If this is making sense to you, consider trying to have a number of your courses waived.
Because if you don't, be prepared to be extremely unsatisfied by the material presented in many of your courses. Prepare to resign yourself to the fact that your triumphs will not be based on conquering a challenging subject or developing competitive transferable skills; No, your triumphs will be over the inanimate screen in front of you. This program will subtly condition you to curse it when you see the word "infeasible." A moment later you will prostrate yourself before its gaze, basking in the warming glow of the words "solution found." With these words you experience great satisfaction.
Just be careful not to consider that you learned how to use Excel for $500 an hour.
If you're considering starting your MBA you need to be aware of one critical aspect of your education: you're going to learn a lot about Excel and you're going to pay a lot to learn it. Solver. Sumproduct. Reference cells. If this is making sense to you, consider trying to have a number of your courses waived.
Because if you don't, be prepared to be extremely unsatisfied by the material presented in many of your courses. Prepare to resign yourself to the fact that your triumphs will not be based on conquering a challenging subject or developing competitive transferable skills; No, your triumphs will be over the inanimate screen in front of you. This program will subtly condition you to curse it when you see the word "infeasible." A moment later you will prostrate yourself before its gaze, basking in the warming glow of the words "solution found." With these words you experience great satisfaction.
Just be careful not to consider that you learned how to use Excel for $500 an hour.
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Newfound Respect
I was sitting in class last night and reflecting on the latest module. It's been rough. Every week has been a struggle to get in the car and drive 20 miles to campus for another three and a half hours of core coursework. I've had to re-evaluate whether I'm wasting my time and money. I have a number of respected colleagues and friends that appraise the MBA as a money pit: You can get all that information and development through self education, they argue.
And they're right. You can get all the education you need from self-education. It may take more time and it will take a lot of discipline. And it's the latter that is the sticking point for most self-education proponents. I have long sought after fellow self-ed enthusiasts to dedicate their time to discussion, research and reflection and I have found only a few - unfortunately thousands of miles separate me from them.
So I found that the only way to find committed people was through an organized, accredited institution. The "free" tag of self-ed is not compulsive enough for most people to participate because there is no commitment. I've been witness to this effect with different online efforts to form communities of self-taught business professionals. Getting people to commit is tremendously difficult.
The people that do commit to something financially and with their time speak volumes. I didn't full grasp this until last night. I looked around the room at people who may not be the smartest people on paper, but they exhibit committment and all that that implies. It's no wonder that people are willing to pay more for an MBA. Many people disparage its value, but it does a fantastic job of identifying people who are willing to make a decision and tough it out. Deciding to stick with a program after a full days work in the office, sitting in traffic to get to campus for a 6:00 to 9:30 PM class represents characteristics of someone I would like to work with and can move business forward.
And they're right. You can get all the education you need from self-education. It may take more time and it will take a lot of discipline. And it's the latter that is the sticking point for most self-education proponents. I have long sought after fellow self-ed enthusiasts to dedicate their time to discussion, research and reflection and I have found only a few - unfortunately thousands of miles separate me from them.
So I found that the only way to find committed people was through an organized, accredited institution. The "free" tag of self-ed is not compulsive enough for most people to participate because there is no commitment. I've been witness to this effect with different online efforts to form communities of self-taught business professionals. Getting people to commit is tremendously difficult.
The people that do commit to something financially and with their time speak volumes. I didn't full grasp this until last night. I looked around the room at people who may not be the smartest people on paper, but they exhibit committment and all that that implies. It's no wonder that people are willing to pay more for an MBA. Many people disparage its value, but it does a fantastic job of identifying people who are willing to make a decision and tough it out. Deciding to stick with a program after a full days work in the office, sitting in traffic to get to campus for a 6:00 to 9:30 PM class represents characteristics of someone I would like to work with and can move business forward.
Monday, May 21, 2007
On Making Decisions
Decisions - crucial or minor - are a facet of business that every employee faces. My decision making method is probably different than my colleague. Maybe I intuit the decision with sparse information. I might run vigorous analysis of available data instead. The point is that there is little uniformity in most business offices when it comes to decision making.
The operations course I am taking now is common across all MBA programs: Decision Modeling. The course posits that decision making can be augmented toward greater success with the educated employment of models. The three primary models available to business men and women are as follows:
This leads to an underlying issue with MBA programs: I am being exposed to a number of great practices, but will I ever use them again? The problem is that processes like decision making modeling require practice - in spades. Once you get past this class, your focus moves either to the next core requisite or to your concentration courses. Not all concentrations employ decision trees equally. So for many, this class is the last time they will see decision modeling and that seems like a waste of time and money.
I need to point out something about this course that is more of a subtext than the headline. Whether you incorporate the models learned into your decision making repertoire or not, this class exposes you to a methodical, tested means to evaluating decisions. It does not substitute intuition with modeling. It incorporates the two. This course exposes the student to thinking about decision from an unnatural perspective: do not make the decision that "feels" right immediately.
If anything, this is the big takeaway from the course.
The operations course I am taking now is common across all MBA programs: Decision Modeling. The course posits that decision making can be augmented toward greater success with the educated employment of models. The three primary models available to business men and women are as follows:
- Decision Trees
- Linear Programming
- Integer Programming
This leads to an underlying issue with MBA programs: I am being exposed to a number of great practices, but will I ever use them again? The problem is that processes like decision making modeling require practice - in spades. Once you get past this class, your focus moves either to the next core requisite or to your concentration courses. Not all concentrations employ decision trees equally. So for many, this class is the last time they will see decision modeling and that seems like a waste of time and money.
I need to point out something about this course that is more of a subtext than the headline. Whether you incorporate the models learned into your decision making repertoire or not, this class exposes you to a methodical, tested means to evaluating decisions. It does not substitute intuition with modeling. It incorporates the two. This course exposes the student to thinking about decision from an unnatural perspective: do not make the decision that "feels" right immediately.
If anything, this is the big takeaway from the course.
Thursday, May 10, 2007
Career Managment Course
A new semester is in bloom. Monday marked the first day of the summer semester. I'm taking three courses during Module A: Intermediate Accounting, Decision Analysis and Managing Your Career. I'm going to discuss the career management course during this post and its implications.
Career management courses are offered with every MBA program; however, many programs are relegating the course to a Pass/Fail elective as they attempt to make the program time competitive. SMU has followed suit. This course was required two years ago when SMU was a 56 credit program and it was dropped at the 48 credit program introduction.
There are a myriad of reasons why a candidate takes this course: to evaluate his current career fit; to determine what he wants to be when he "grows up;" and/or to better understand his strengths and weaknesses, among others. I fall into the first two options.
My first tasks were to complete the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), a Work-Life Values Assessment and the CareerLeader(TM) Assessment. Our first lecture was devoted to the MBTI.
For those of you unfamiliar with the MBTI, it is an assessment that measures your preferences according to four opposing parameters: Extraversion to Introversion, Sensing to Intuition, Thinking to Feeling and Judging to Perceiving. I must emphasize that these are preferences: just because you prefer to be a thinker does not mean you do not feel and vice versa.
Career management courses are offered with every MBA program; however, many programs are relegating the course to a Pass/Fail elective as they attempt to make the program time competitive. SMU has followed suit. This course was required two years ago when SMU was a 56 credit program and it was dropped at the 48 credit program introduction.
There are a myriad of reasons why a candidate takes this course: to evaluate his current career fit; to determine what he wants to be when he "grows up;" and/or to better understand his strengths and weaknesses, among others. I fall into the first two options.
My first tasks were to complete the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), a Work-Life Values Assessment and the CareerLeader(TM) Assessment. Our first lecture was devoted to the MBTI.
For those of you unfamiliar with the MBTI, it is an assessment that measures your preferences according to four opposing parameters: Extraversion to Introversion, Sensing to Intuition, Thinking to Feeling and Judging to Perceiving. I must emphasize that these are preferences: just because you prefer to be a thinker does not mean you do not feel and vice versa.
The instrument gives you the ability to evaluate what you prefer to do rather than what you can do. And if you are throwing down a substantial amount of money on an MBA, it behooves you to figure this out.
Furthermore, you will find that you have a number of prejudices against personalities contrary to your own. If you are energized by introverted activities, you tend to give greater credence to others who are similarly energized and denigrate the extravert activities. This awareness can help you increase your emotional intelligence and be a better manager and leader in spite of your known biases.
The strength of this tool lies in identifying what elements you want in your career. I have a number of potential career paths on which I can continue. There are a number of positions that sound exciting and fulfilling. As I continue to evaluate my next career step, the tools with which I will be equipped in this course will play a role in weeding out paths that contain elements I do not prefer.
Be sure you take advantage of a course like this during your MBA career. The dividends are well worth the investment.
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Back to Earth
Had you asked me what my opinion on an MBA was eight weeks ago, I would have espoused the virtues and necessity of getting the MBA. I'd call this my honeymoon period with graduate school.
Eight weeks later, two more classes completed and I'm singing a different tune. All the articles I read denigrating the value of the MBA make more sense. The successful entrepreneurs like Guy Kawasaki that fight against MBA education sound less like popular self-deprecators and more like sage advisers.
This has been quite the pendulum swing. And I haven't quite made sense of it.
This past week I had a reading assignment for my Organizational Behavior. At the same time, I finished one of the best books I've read the past year: How the Scots Invented the Modern World by Arthur Herman. Both reading pieces used statements from Adam Smith to make points: Specialization is good because it moves society/business forward. I agree. However, business school forgets the warning Adam Smith and Alex Ferguson gave: the pitfall of specialization is a society that allows people to focus purely on their specialty and does not encourage a liberal arts education that enables citizens to think "outside the box."
This needs to be restated: if we allow people to specialize without explaining the source of ideas and how ideas fit together, we develop myopic people and a myopic society. This rings true for me in the broader scheme - i.e. United States, the World, etc. - and more specifically in my microcosm of life - i.e. School, Workplace, etc.
My biggest disappoint with this module has been this issue. Last night our course had a guest speaker that disparaged some of the natural sciences, arguing them as irrelevant to business. I wrote on my paper, "Everything that is left on this presentation is now suspect." And I've realized, that the professors I've had this module teach from this perspective: their specialty is paramount.
What a let down. Coming into the program, I was excited about the tools I was going to walk away with. Through the first module, the material presentation impressed me. My feet are now firmly back on earth: the burden for insuring that I have a firm grasp of multiple mental models rests squarely on my shoulders.
I'm sticking with the MBA program. I'll finish it. Some of the other benefits I listed for pursuing the degree are still valid. However, my view about the content has been skewed. I have professors who are true authorities and worthy of emulation. Others leave little to be desired. This empowers me to continue reading books on physics, social behavior, microbiology, etc. I'm the better for it.
Eight weeks later, two more classes completed and I'm singing a different tune. All the articles I read denigrating the value of the MBA make more sense. The successful entrepreneurs like Guy Kawasaki that fight against MBA education sound less like popular self-deprecators and more like sage advisers.
This has been quite the pendulum swing. And I haven't quite made sense of it.
This past week I had a reading assignment for my Organizational Behavior. At the same time, I finished one of the best books I've read the past year: How the Scots Invented the Modern World by Arthur Herman. Both reading pieces used statements from Adam Smith to make points: Specialization is good because it moves society/business forward. I agree. However, business school forgets the warning Adam Smith and Alex Ferguson gave: the pitfall of specialization is a society that allows people to focus purely on their specialty and does not encourage a liberal arts education that enables citizens to think "outside the box."
This needs to be restated: if we allow people to specialize without explaining the source of ideas and how ideas fit together, we develop myopic people and a myopic society. This rings true for me in the broader scheme - i.e. United States, the World, etc. - and more specifically in my microcosm of life - i.e. School, Workplace, etc.
My biggest disappoint with this module has been this issue. Last night our course had a guest speaker that disparaged some of the natural sciences, arguing them as irrelevant to business. I wrote on my paper, "Everything that is left on this presentation is now suspect." And I've realized, that the professors I've had this module teach from this perspective: their specialty is paramount.
What a let down. Coming into the program, I was excited about the tools I was going to walk away with. Through the first module, the material presentation impressed me. My feet are now firmly back on earth: the burden for insuring that I have a firm grasp of multiple mental models rests squarely on my shoulders.
I'm sticking with the MBA program. I'll finish it. Some of the other benefits I listed for pursuing the degree are still valid. However, my view about the content has been skewed. I have professors who are true authorities and worthy of emulation. Others leave little to be desired. This empowers me to continue reading books on physics, social behavior, microbiology, etc. I'm the better for it.
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Career Management Post-MBA
I had dinner last week with the Dartmouth's former Admissions Dean and Director for Career Management. Of course, my graduate work was a topic of discussion. My post-MBA plans followed.
The conversation had some salient points for MBA candidates:
An MBA candidate who does not have this pedigree has a number of questions to answer:
The conversation had some salient points for MBA candidates:
- If you are going after your MBA to switch careers and/or industries, your education pedigree can play a major role depending on your target;
- Despite an MBA award, you may have to start at or near the bottom of the ladder if you do switch to a competitive industry.
An MBA candidate who does not have this pedigree has a number of questions to answer:
- How did an SMU MBA in Finance prepare you like Dartmouth's?
- What gave you the chops to make it in the competitive banking world?
- Why should I take a chance on you?
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
To wait or not to wait...
I had originally planned on starting my coursework with the 61st class at SMU in Fall, 2007. That was until I was deftly persuaded to begin early this January. Now that I am a few months into the program, some downsides to starting early are beginning to rear their ugly heads.
Premises:
These premises present some difficult realities due to my program of study and the courses I want to add to my curriculum.
Issues:
So the courses I feel are in line with what I want to accomplish during my graduate career are virtually taken off my slate of possibilities. This Fall I will be unable to begin either of the above courses because I will be working on concentration entry requirements.
So why bring attention to this? For those of you working on your MBA, whether to begin traditionally in the Fall or matriculate to the Spring should be given more thought than simple schedule convenience. If you cannot take some of the classes you are certain will equip you with tools you need post-graduation, you will need to make alternative plans. For example:
This list is not exhaustive. I'm going with the second option right now. Finance is my concentration and I am deficient when it comes to investment knowledge so I'm taking the following steps:
This summer I will also reach out to our resident professor for investments and attempt to set up a bi-weekly meeting to discuss what I have read and how it can be applied.
The Bottom Line: Just because you're paying an exorbitant amount of money to get the MBA, you cannot stop self educating yourself or reaching deeper into the subject matter. While it may be difficult to balance everything that has claim to your life, I encourage you to pay attention to what areas you need to stretch yourself due to the restrictions a traditional program will place on you.
Premises:
- My program completion date is December 2008 after the first semester school year 2008-2009 conclusion;
- A handful of advanced courses are two semesters long, beginning the first semester of each school year; and
- I will not complete my core course work until the conclusion of Fall 2007, Module A.
These premises present some difficult realities due to my program of study and the courses I want to add to my curriculum.
Issues:
- One of the courses is a practicum for investments: the enrolled students actively participate in managing an SMU investment fund, acting as analysts and fund principles. The course is only offered in Fall and Spring across both semesters.
- Another course is on mergers and acquisitions and faces the same issue.
So the courses I feel are in line with what I want to accomplish during my graduate career are virtually taken off my slate of possibilities. This Fall I will be unable to begin either of the above courses because I will be working on concentration entry requirements.
So why bring attention to this? For those of you working on your MBA, whether to begin traditionally in the Fall or matriculate to the Spring should be given more thought than simple schedule convenience. If you cannot take some of the classes you are certain will equip you with tools you need post-graduation, you will need to make alternative plans. For example:
- Extend your B-school graduation date by one semester so you can take those important courses;
- Jump into some intense self-directed study on the courses you are really interested in and approach the professors as mentors;
- Convince faculty to shift the course to Summer/Fall or create another section in the Summer/Fall; or
- Start a club on the topic and invite industry leaders to give lectures and hold round tables.
This list is not exhaustive. I'm going with the second option right now. Finance is my concentration and I am deficient when it comes to investment knowledge so I'm taking the following steps:
- Picked up three books by Benjamin Graham: The Intelligent Investor, Security Analysis and The Interpretation of Financial Statements;
- I've downloaded and compiled all the available Chairman Letters from Warren Buffet, Berkshire Hathaway; and
- I'm going over a few of the course notes on MIT's Open Courseware.
This summer I will also reach out to our resident professor for investments and attempt to set up a bi-weekly meeting to discuss what I have read and how it can be applied.
The Bottom Line: Just because you're paying an exorbitant amount of money to get the MBA, you cannot stop self educating yourself or reaching deeper into the subject matter. While it may be difficult to balance everything that has claim to your life, I encourage you to pay attention to what areas you need to stretch yourself due to the restrictions a traditional program will place on you.
Monday, March 19, 2007
Module B: In Full Swing
This past week included the two introductory courses to Module B at SMU: Organizational Behavior on Thursday night and Executive Statistics on Saturday morning. The tone set in both is dramatically different than the Module A courses.
Neither class will be as intuitively challenging as the Module A courses. Organizational Behavior should be a welcome respite for many students from the rigors of Economics and Accounting. Statistics is also straight forward, but it will require a highly attentive student.
Discrete math is limited in scope to algebraic functions -- we covered "solving for 'X'" using means and extremes during the first class. Square roots, natural logarithms, "e," etc.: This is the language of statistics. Words like binomial and equations named after their creators are common. Because this is the type of math every student is required to do, be prepared for lots of out-of-class work and number crunching.
Hopefully, you will get a professor that shares my professor's view: statistics needs to be applicable. Her examples are frought with practical application and dogma free.
Organizational behavior boils down to involvement in class and staying on top of reading. There are two primary approaches to management courses: Case Study and Theory. Harvard is known for being the best case study school and whatever b-school you attend, you can be sure you will be tasked with working a Harvard Business School case study at least once. Schools that lean to theory have you read lots of "How to.." material. SMU happens to be a hybrid between the two.
I prefer the case study methodology. A constant exposure to crises and situations is a great way to learn and evaluate what should be done from a real world perspective. At least I'm getting some of that.
Neither class will be as intuitively challenging as the Module A courses. Organizational Behavior should be a welcome respite for many students from the rigors of Economics and Accounting. Statistics is also straight forward, but it will require a highly attentive student.
Discrete math is limited in scope to algebraic functions -- we covered "solving for 'X'" using means and extremes during the first class. Square roots, natural logarithms, "e," etc.: This is the language of statistics. Words like binomial and equations named after their creators are common. Because this is the type of math every student is required to do, be prepared for lots of out-of-class work and number crunching.
Hopefully, you will get a professor that shares my professor's view: statistics needs to be applicable. Her examples are frought with practical application and dogma free.
Organizational behavior boils down to involvement in class and staying on top of reading. There are two primary approaches to management courses: Case Study and Theory. Harvard is known for being the best case study school and whatever b-school you attend, you can be sure you will be tasked with working a Harvard Business School case study at least once. Schools that lean to theory have you read lots of "How to.." material. SMU happens to be a hybrid between the two.
I prefer the case study methodology. A constant exposure to crises and situations is a great way to learn and evaluate what should be done from a real world perspective. At least I'm getting some of that.
Monday, March 5, 2007
Two down, Twenty-Two to Go
I spent Monday and Wednesday night last week completing my first two courses with the two most comprehensive exams I have ever taken.
Three hours were allotted to each exam: I used two and a half hours for accounting and two hours for economics. More than 70 percent of the class was still around when I left submitted my exam and I learned that the professor allowed an additional 10 minutes and still needed to collect incomplete finals from some students.
The accounting final was the most comprehensive exam I have ever taken. We were handed two booklets: a 16 page exam and a 20 page financial statement packet. We covered everything we discussed in class:
And while the inclination for many of us when we start relating exam war stories is to complain about how much of a beating they are, I thoroughly enjoyed the process. I find myself falling into the True Believer mentality that over exagerates exasperation with being aggressively tested; I enjoyed the thorough exercise. I feel confident that I can create said financial statements and provide intuitive insightful analysis of a firm's activity. And that's what I'm paying for in my program.
The economics exam was challenging, but not as comprehensive. This was due to extenuating circumstances with our professor. The difference between this exam and undergraduate economics exam is the format. Undergraduate economics exams focus more on the principles from a vacuum perspective: in a perfectly competitive or pure monopoly market, what happens to the "fill in the blank" curve when "X" happens? The questions on this exam were a little more abstract and derived from real world examples. This exam stretched me to think in realistic terms, not just theoretical.
My first module is behind me. I already have prep work assigned for my next two classes. I am currently on Spring Break in Colorado and I'm somewhat anxious to get back to the grind. I will probably end up blogging about how to disassociate during these break times. But not now.
Three hours were allotted to each exam: I used two and a half hours for accounting and two hours for economics. More than 70 percent of the class was still around when I left submitted my exam and I learned that the professor allowed an additional 10 minutes and still needed to collect incomplete finals from some students.
The accounting final was the most comprehensive exam I have ever taken. We were handed two booklets: a 16 page exam and a 20 page financial statement packet. We covered everything we discussed in class:
- the Balance Sheet;
- the Income Statement (Statement of Operations);
- the Cash Flow Statement;
- Ratio Analysis; and
- Revenue Recognition.
And while the inclination for many of us when we start relating exam war stories is to complain about how much of a beating they are, I thoroughly enjoyed the process. I find myself falling into the True Believer mentality that over exagerates exasperation with being aggressively tested; I enjoyed the thorough exercise. I feel confident that I can create said financial statements and provide intuitive insightful analysis of a firm's activity. And that's what I'm paying for in my program.
The economics exam was challenging, but not as comprehensive. This was due to extenuating circumstances with our professor. The difference between this exam and undergraduate economics exam is the format. Undergraduate economics exams focus more on the principles from a vacuum perspective: in a perfectly competitive or pure monopoly market, what happens to the "fill in the blank" curve when "X" happens? The questions on this exam were a little more abstract and derived from real world examples. This exam stretched me to think in realistic terms, not just theoretical.
My first module is behind me. I already have prep work assigned for my next two classes. I am currently on Spring Break in Colorado and I'm somewhat anxious to get back to the grind. I will probably end up blogging about how to disassociate during these break times. But not now.
Friday, February 23, 2007
The First Summit
The next five days represent the first summit I will have to ascend during this two year assault. It's finals time. That means the next post will come during the modular break. Stay tuned.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
